...
Owners of females make the actual decision to use an approved male for breeding or not. Effectively they are in charge of the actual breeding. Owners of the males only have a ‘product’ on the market. They may need to put some effort into marketing of their product. Quite often marketing is at least as important as quality of the males where it comes to reasons for mate choice by owners of females. A top sire determines the competitive value of a breeding organization.
Thus:
| Paneel | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Mating decisions have no influence at population level, but may have some effect at the level of individual mating. |
Relation of mate selection with inbreeding
Remember that an animal is inbred if his parents are related: Fanimal = ½ * abetween parents. Parents are related if they have ancestors in common. The fewer generation away this common ancestor is, the more the parents are related. Offspring of a full brother and sister have an inbreeding coefficient of ½*0.5 = 0.25. The less two parents are related, the less the offspring is inbred. Some breeding organisations have regulations to avoid mating of close relatives. The Dutch Kennel Club (overall organisation of the various dog breeds in the Netherlands and in charge of pedigree registration of all registered purebred dogs), for example, has the regulation that no pedigree will registered for offspring of a bitch that was mated to her grandfather, her father, her brother, her son, or her grandson.
Thus:
| Paneel | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Mate selection should take the additive genetic relationship between both potential parents into account as that is a direct indication of the inbreeding coefficient of the offspring. |