Spring naar het einde van metadata
Ga nar het begin van metadata

Je bekijkt een oude versie van deze pagina. Bekijk de huidige versie.

Vergelijk met huidige Toon pagina geschiedenis

« Vorige Versie 9 Volgende »

A crucial moment in the real world of animal breeding is the mating of dams and sires to produce the next generation of animals. Before mating, the owner of the breeding females has evaluated his animals and selected the females with a view to his breeding goal. And, he has selected a few males which comply to his breeding goal and are expected to improve the average genetic and phenotypic level of his animals. Then, still the question exists: which female to mate with which male?

In practice, breeders often use(d) compensatory matings. The shortcomings in certain traits of a selected female are compensated by the choice of a selected male that is outstanding for these traits. The offspring is expected not to have the shortcomings of the female.

However, even though this sounds very logical, there is no guarantee that all matings will result in a success! At individual level, there are a number of factors that may influence the expected result of mate choice:

  1. Mendelian sampling. The fact that a sire and a dam transmit 50 percent of their alleles to their offspring and you cannot predict which 50 percent. This introduces a chance factor, even if you know the EBV for father and mother very accurately.

  1. Pleiotropic (one gene affects multiple traits) and epistatic effects (gene-gene interactions). It is possible that a trait, for example leg quality, is affected by a gene that interacts with another gene. If one of those genes has the wrong allele in the offspring then the legs won’t be improved.

  1. What is the accuracy of the information that the selection decision is based on? For example, is genetics or management responsible for the performance? You should especially ask yourself such questions in the absence of an accurate EBV.

Thus: compensatory mating involves finding the best male for individual females to compensate her shortcomings.

Compensatory mating may have an effect on individual mating results, but selection determines the increase in population level .
An example of a mating system for dairy cattle aAa® with compensatory elements was created in 1950 by U.S. Holstein breeder and classifier Bill Weeks and is outlined in chapter 10.2.1. In 10.2.2 CRV’s SAP mating system for dairy cows outlined that is developed to compensate in planned matings the weak characteristics of a cow with strong characteristics of a bull.

  • Geen labels